Kitchen and Home Appliance Forum : Appliance Odometer

Welcome This is an OPEN FORUM. You don’t need to register to join in. Just click on a category and tell us what you think. To join an existing conversation, simply click on an existing topic and add your comments. Please, don’t be shy. Join in. We’re excited to hear what you have to say.
Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

Search 
Search Forums:


 




UserPost

12:29 pm
February 18, 2008


NightOwl

Moderator

posts 22

Here’s more from the great thinkers at halfbakery.com.  I really enjoy these ideas.

Keep track of instances/hours of kitchen appliance use:

I’m using my CostCo rice cooker bought a few months ago for the 3d time right now; it cost $30, so at the moment, I’m right at a $10 surcharge for each 4-cup rice serving, which is pretty expensive. However, in the medium term, I think it will end up saving me money on food, by helping me meet my resolution to spend less money on restaurant meals, and I’d therefore like to keep track of how often I …
Read original blog post


Read original blog post

1:26 pm
February 21, 2008


Denny

Guest

I don’t know if I really want to know how much money I wasted buying a juicer…or a rice steamer…or an air popcorn popper or… maybe it would keep me from buying more stuff!

Add a New Topic Reply to Post


Reply to Topic: Appliance Odometer

NOTE: New Posts are subject to administrator approval before being displayed

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 6 + 12        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

About the Appliance . net forum

Currently Online:

3 Guests

Maximum Online: 15

Forums:

Groups: 2

Forums: 11

Topics: 103

Posts: 211

Members:

There are 7 members

There are 107 guests


ApplianceGuy has made 3 posts

Top Posters:

NightOwl - 22

WorkinMan - 1

hunttr - 1

raleig22 - 1

carolbunning - 1

Administrator: ApplianceGuy | Moderators: ApplianceGuy, WorkinMan, NightOwl


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.1.4 (Build 357)  

Comments are closed.