<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Truth in Appliance Energy Labeling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appliance.net/2009/truth-in-appliance-energy-labeling-1516/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appliance.net/2009/truth-in-appliance-energy-labeling-1516</link>
	<description>Appliance news, reviews, ratings, reports and buyers guides.  Locate repairs and parts. for home and kitchen appliances.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.appliance.net/2009/truth-in-appliance-energy-labeling-1516/comment-page-1#comment-78290</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appliance.net/?p=1516#comment-78290</guid>
		<description>I thought that at least one of the major appliance companies were contesting this ruling, since the DOE wasn&#039;t being clear on what information the manufacturers were supposed to provide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that at least one of the major appliance companies were contesting this ruling, since the DOE wasn&#8217;t being clear on what information the manufacturers were supposed to provide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

